首页> 外文OA文献 >A Primer on the History and Proper Drafting of Qualified Domestic-Relations Orders
【2h】

A Primer on the History and Proper Drafting of Qualified Domestic-Relations Orders

机译:合格的家庭关系命令的历史和正确起草入门

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The divorce rate in the United States is slightly more than one-half the marriage rate. Divorce is a fact of life in this country, and will likely be so for the foreseeable future. On August 23, 1984, the divorce lawyer’s job got more complicated when Congress created the Qualified Domestic Relations Order (\u22QDRO\u22) as part of some significant amendments to ERISA. QDROs are necessary because before those 1984 ERISA amendments, a lot of divorced persons discovered that they could be deprived of their marital or community property interest in their former spouses\u27 retirement plans. For most divorcing couples, the two largest assets of the marriage are the marital home and retirement accounts. Over ninety-nine million persons participate in private sector retirement plans, and those plans\u27 assets total more than $4 trillion, which exceeds the total value of all residential real estate in the United States. Dividing retirement accounts is not as simple as a court decreeing that each party gets one-half of the other party\u27s account. It takes a properly drafted QDRO to make sure each party gets his or her marital or community property share of the other\u27s retirement benefits. Drafting a QDRO can be time consuming, complex, and frustrating in part because it requires lawyers who primarily practice state law to have a working knowledge of parts of the notoriously lengthy and complex ERISA. A substantial number – perhaps a majority – of QDROs are not prepared properly because they do not reflect the parties\u27 understanding of what they were awarded in the divorce proceeding. In fact, a former administrator for a retirement plan stated that between fifteen and twenty percent of the time, lawyers fail to see a QDRO through to completion. This article will detail the history leading to the creation of QDROs, explain what QDROs are, and offer suggestions on what pitfalls to look for and avoid in drafting them.
机译:在美国,离婚率略高于婚姻率的一半。离婚是这个国家的生活事实,在可预见的将来很可能会如此。 1984年8月23日,美国国会制定了《合格的国内关系命令》(\ u22QDRO \ u22),作为ERISA重大修改的一部分,离婚律师的工作变得更加复杂。 QDRO是必要的,因为在1984年ERISA修订之前,许多离婚者发现他们可能失去其前配偶退休计划中的婚姻或社区财产权益。对于大多数离婚夫妇而言,婚姻的两个最大资产是婚姻住房和退休账户。超过9,900万人参加了私营部门的退休计划,这些计划的资产总额超过4万亿美元,超过了美国所有住宅房地产的总价值。划分退休金帐户并不像法院判决每一方获得另一方帐户的一半那样简单。需要起草适当的QDRO,以确保每一方都能从对方的退休金中获得自己的婚姻或社区财产份额。起草QDRO可能很耗时,复杂且令人沮丧,部分原因是它要求主要从事州法律的律师具有众所周知的冗长而复杂的ERISA的部分工作知识。大量(也许是大多数)QDRO准备不当,因为它们不能反映当事方对他们在离婚程序中所获奖励的理解。实际上,一位退休计划的前管理人员表示,在15%到20%的时间内,律师无法看到QDRO的完成。本文将详细介绍导致创建QDRO的历史,解释什么是QDRO,并就寻找和避免起草它们时的陷阱提供建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cain, Terrence;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号